• When will eco terrorists like the sea Shepard go have sex with a tree or something instead of inciting violence?

    I live in the faroe islands and the sea shepherd is always trying to stop us from eating whales. Theh harass and bully us and assult us.
    I live in the faroe islands and the sea shepherd is always trying to stop us from eating whales. Theh harass and bully us and assult us.
    6 answers · Other - Environment · 6 days ago
  • Are male lions happy being alone, or do they like to be surrounded by their family-female lion and lion cubs?

    Best answer: They are willing to fight to gain a pride, they have to be driven out as cubs, and as young lions they often team up with their brothers, so it is evident they prefer being with family. Whether that's for practical versus emotional reasons is a different question. They kill rivals' cubs upon gaining a... show more
    Best answer: They are willing to fight to gain a pride, they have to be driven out as cubs, and as young lions they often team up with their brothers, so it is evident they prefer being with family. Whether that's for practical versus emotional reasons is a different question. They kill rivals' cubs upon gaining a pride, though.
    4 answers · Other - Environment · 1 week ago
  • Worried about the heatwave in the uk?

    It’s been hot for weeks in England I really hate it . And now they say it’s going to get to 40C which is dangerous . How can we Survive this also I’m not planning on going out while it’s like this . They say it could last til November . I’m not happy about this as I’m very stressed . As lots of people have died... show more
    It’s been hot for weeks in England I really hate it . And now they say it’s going to get to 40C which is dangerous . How can we Survive this also I’m not planning on going out while it’s like this . They say it could last til November . I’m not happy about this as I’m very stressed . As lots of people have died from this in China . This is not a joke .
    16 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Global Warming: Who are the most alarmist here; deniers or alarmists ...?

    ... or skeptics and proponents, if you prefer. Who are the most alarmist? ... and why?
    ... or skeptics and proponents, if you prefer. Who are the most alarmist? ... and why?
    12 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Why does the BBC use climate change deniers to provide balance to global warming debate when these people are nutters with nothing to add?

    Best answer: Some one writes "The BBC are totally biased about climate change" I agree they are also biased about the shape of the earth, the age of the earth and other facts.
    Best answer: Some one writes "The BBC are totally biased about climate change" I agree they are also biased about the shape of the earth, the age of the earth and other facts.
    16 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Global warming vs Government control vs mother nature?

    Best answer: Mother Nature via the Sun and natural variances control the Earth's Climate. Humans have no control, Nature will and cannot be fooled.

    The Sun is transitioning into an inactive cycle that will result in Global Cooling for the next 30 years, this is proven scientific fact.
    Best answer: Mother Nature via the Sun and natural variances control the Earth's Climate. Humans have no control, Nature will and cannot be fooled.

    The Sun is transitioning into an inactive cycle that will result in Global Cooling for the next 30 years, this is proven scientific fact.
    8 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Does being a Global Warming Alarmist mean you never have to say you are sorry?

    Best answer: It sure does. Just look at Elizabeth: She defends her crappy British Isles power scenario. This is where thousands of people died from extreme cold for not being able to afford the high energy prices. https://www.thegwpf.com/48000-brits-dead-after-worst-winter-in-42-years/ Then this out of balance person wants to... show more
    Best answer: It sure does. Just look at Elizabeth: She defends her crappy British Isles power scenario. This is where thousands of people died from extreme cold for not being able to afford the high energy prices.

    https://www.thegwpf.com/48000-brits-dead...

    Then this out of balance person wants to do things that would make it even more expensive and restrictive. She and others like her, if they had any morality at all, should apologize. Their wanton disregard for human life is appalling!

    Elizabeth and her ilk take $1.5 trillion out of the world's economy for an unproven theory while millions starve to death. Mind you these are sick people who can raise taxes and enact terrible laws that don't work then ask for even more taxes and terrible laws, all the while heaping more financial burdens on the helpless.

    https://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2...

    No people like Elizabeth and al Gore will never say they are sorry, for it would take some sort of conscience to do that.
    Just look at Venezuela, their President just said today that their form of government failed. Yet who does he blame? Why the US, of course.

    https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2...

    And for ANON: Check out your facts. I have friends in Canada. They come to the US for something serious. So don't go pushing that Commie bluster here! I have a daughter that came down with POEMS disease. Only one hospital could cure it at the time and that was Sloan-Kettering in the USA. Also, when Africa had an Ebola outbreak, they shipped many of those patients to Omaha, Nebraska and cured many of them. Omaha is in the USA not the Congo or Canada. So check your FACTS!

    So in direct answer to your question: They should say they are sorry, but they won't!

    Just look at Elizabeth, she says it isn't 48000 deaths but only 3000 caused by her type. Yikes! I thought saviors of the Earth were supposed to SAVE lives, not cast poor people off as collateral damage. But as to the question, you see, no apology from Liz. It is "Well, other nations have this too." It is never their fault. Thank you Liz for proving the point. You did it demonstrably good.

    Then she puts her symbolic foot in her mouth by taking on the US medical system. She tries to change the subject by comparing dollars to results. I don't care if the US spends ten times more than other countries, we take on the world's medical problems more than any other country. People flock from all over the world to come to the USA to cure their medical problems. Remember what I said about Ebola? Those people didn't go to your country to get cured, they came to the USA and got cured at American taxpayer's expense. So suck it up buttercup! You 'saviors of the world' only make matters worse then blame someone else for YOUR failures.
    4 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Why don't global warming deniers just admit that they would rather see people die than do anything about global warming?

    Best answer: Our modern societies are built on one fundamental aspect - predictability. We know how much water our cities need, we know how much rainfall we get, we know where to build reservoirs and what their capacity is. We know how many hours of sunlight we get, what crops to grow, where they should be located, what soil... show more
    Best answer: Our modern societies are built on one fundamental aspect - predictability. We know how much water our cities need, we know how much rainfall we get, we know where to build reservoirs and what their capacity is. We know how many hours of sunlight we get, what crops to grow, where they should be located, what soil temperatures are likely to be, what yields we can expect, how many days of frost we get, and how much animal feed we need in the winter. We know how high the tides get, how often we should expect storms, what windspeeds we typically observe, what river levels we can expect, and how often they flood. And so on ...

    Whether the impacts of global warming are 'beneficial' or 'harmful' to a region is pretty irrelevant. The point is it represents uncertainty and deviates us away from the norms we've been used to. We might be able to grow more of crop A in one region (that's a plus) thanks to global warming, and less of crop B in another region (that's a minus), but now we have to rethink what we plant, where we plant it, how we distribute it, and what yields we can expect of each. In other words, we have to adapt to that change. And what if we get more or less snowfall per year? Or more or less rain? Or more or less frosty mornings? Or more heatwaves? Or higher risks of flooding in one region? Or less in another? How do these 'beneficial' or 'harmful' changes impact the way we do things?

    So I don't think of climate change in terms of 'number of people who die'. I think of climate change like stock markets and share prices - everyone is happy when things are predictable but when you introduce uncertainty everything shifts about rapidly as people move money from X to Y to try to adapt. And in the case of global warming, doing nothing just means the uncertainty grows so we have more and more headaches trying to figure out how we constantly adjust. This uncertainty is, to me, the main issue because it ultimately costs us all hard cold cash to keep on top of it all. It is easier just to remove the uncertainty by trying to stop global warming in the first place.

    Now, what we had was lots of people who were happy. They were getting big fat loans from the banks, big fat mortgages, multiple credit cards and living it up. And of course, the banks were all happy to authorise those. Wahey, they thought. When we get repaid we'll make loads of money. Until the uncertainty hit - em, these people can't actually repay us. Oh no! We've crashed the whole system with our stupidity.

    This is exactly how I see deniers. They want to keep doing what they're doing (like the people getting massive mortgages they had no hope of ever paying off) because they're happy ignoring the uncertainty looming around the corner.
    21 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • If Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming or Climate Change was true, would Communism be the answer to solve this problem?

    Best answer: Communism is a cancer on the world. It and fascism killed a hundred million people last century. Fascism and Communism have been resurrected by the green movement and the useful idiots like Jim that enable the fascists and socialists to move forward. These idiots call that progressivism. Only a sick mind would... show more
    Best answer: Communism is a cancer on the world. It and fascism killed a hundred million people last century. Fascism and Communism have been resurrected by the green movement and the useful idiots like Jim that enable the fascists and socialists to move forward. These idiots call that progressivism. Only a sick mind would think that inflicting their progressivism on us Normals is the solution to our problems. These are the dull witted bozos that want to ban straws and plastic bags to save the planet. They disgust me with their claims of being backed by science. They aren't backed by anything except Lenin's backhanded complement, that they are the most useful of idiots. Normals need to take our country back from these fascists. They can keep Canada and England but the US needs to start treating these people like they deserve to be treated. It isn't nice enabling stupidity.
    10 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Global warming: Is it becoming more obvious?

    Global warming: Is it becoming more obvious?

    Best answer: experts seems to say so
    Best answer: experts seems to say so
    13 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • How did Noah's Ark flood happen in the middle of an ice age?

    Global warming is melting the snow from the North pole to the South Pole and every mountain range in the entire world. Every single day scientists etc are finding microbes, plants, insects, birds, mammals, reptiles etc that were buried in the snow either at the beginning of the ice age millions of years ago or... show more
    Global warming is melting the snow from the North pole to the South Pole and every mountain range in the entire world. Every single day scientists etc are finding microbes, plants, insects, birds, mammals, reptiles etc that were buried in the snow either at the beginning of the ice age millions of years ago or during the ice age when buried in snow avalanches or simply dying in a snow bank..
    18 answers · Jokes & Riddles · 2 weeks ago
  • Isn't it true that those who support the Global Warming theory really don't care about human lives but more for their agenda?

    Best answer: The left typically cares primarily about their leftists agenda. That is why I accurately call them cultists. Of course there are varying degrees of leftism and there is hope for some. As I was going to work this morning, I learned about Starbucks plan to ban straws as were some municipalities. One was planning... show more
    Best answer: The left typically cares primarily about their leftists agenda. That is why I accurately call them cultists. Of course there are varying degrees of leftism and there is hope for some. As I was going to work this morning, I learned about Starbucks plan to ban straws as were some municipalities. One was planning to put a 6 month jail term for giving one straw. These are the same people that shelter illegal criminals that infest some neighborhoods.

    Why are they going to ban straws? To save the ocean. What is their solution? A bigger lid with a straw like part to it which has more plastic than the lid and straw together. So their solution is worse than their so called problem and this is typical but the left are trying to prove they care. It ends up being nothing short of a cultist ritual to show you belong. If you resist, the fascist put you in jail.

    The sad truth is that the US by and large puts its plastic safely in landfills. The plastic in the ocean is almost exclusively from Latin American and East Asian countries. Banning straws in the US will do almost nothing but these cultists need to keep inventing new rituals for their cultist following. It is no different with AGW alarmists. They are simply too caught up in their cult and patting themselves on the back to realize it.
    7 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Agree or disagree? Global warming is bs?

    Best answer: To be clear Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming is totaly BS! (So that you Y!A censors don't go ballistic, BS stands for (B)ad (S)cience.) Wink! Wink!
    Best answer: To be clear Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming is totaly BS! (So that you Y!A censors don't go ballistic, BS stands for (B)ad (S)cience.) Wink! Wink!
    11 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Global Warming: How is media going to report?

    Best answer: Well, what the media will wrongly report is that virtually any strange or unusual weather event is due to global warming. I say that, and I'm an 'alarmist' ... so I'm actually agreeing (to a point!) with Sagebrush. I've always had sympathy with the 'skeptic' view that the media are... show more
    Best answer: Well, what the media will wrongly report is that virtually any strange or unusual weather event is due to global warming. I say that, and I'm an 'alarmist' ... so I'm actually agreeing (to a point!) with Sagebrush. I've always had sympathy with the 'skeptic' view that the media are hyping aspects of global warming in ways that are not consistent with the actual science.

    I think this state of affairs happens because the people who write such articles are, by and large, humanities graduates. Media outlets should be hiring more scientists to report on scientific matters ... and scientists should be more active in public engagement.

    To give an example, I'm sure just about anyone on this global warming section will be able to tell you something about the Higgs boson. Some on here might have heard something similar to the following - I'm not a celebrity, I go to a party, I can get to the bar relatively easily. Beyonce walks in and now everyone crowds around her, impeding her journey to the bar. This is how the Higgs field interacts with particles to give mass. And so on ... the point is you look at something like quantum or particle or theoretical physics and they've done a marvelous job of communication. Climate change? Not quite the same ...
    6 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago
  • Were global warming eco-fascists crying on November 8, 2016?

    Best answer: Yes ,No 4th Riech for them
    Best answer: Yes ,No 4th Riech for them
    6 answers · Global Warming · 2 weeks ago