The 'climate change issue' has been stacked with lies. Right out of the bag the claim that '97% of all the scientists in the world' agree with 'climate change' is an outright lie. Then you have people like Al Gore who even admits that he lies:
Quote by Al Gore, former U.S. vice president, and large CO2 producer: "I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis."
'Over-representation' is a fancy word for lie. Then you have other people admit that it is only economics, not environment:
Quote by Ottmar Edenhoffer, high level UN-IPCC official: "We redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy...Basically it's a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization...One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore."
Then you have others that even admit that this 'climate change issue' is phoney and is just a road to lead everyone to communism.
Quote by Christine Stewart, former Canadian Environment Minister: “No matter if the science is all phony, there are collateral environmental benefits.... climate change [provides] the greatest chance to bring about justice and equality in the world.”
"Justice and equality' are code words for communism. Still not convinced? Just look at what those environmentalists have in store for us if they succeed in their agenda:
Quote from the UN's Own "Agenda 21": "Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level."
Now what happens if you are not reoriented? Stalin's mass killing comes to mind. Be a robot or be killed.
So you can see the reason that intelligent people do not believe that mankind's actions are destroying the earth: Advocates admit that it isn't about the environment, but economics, that one of the biggest advocates is an admitted liar, that the science is phoney and that it leads mankind into tyranny. Wow! Do you really want that?