What if evolution was a lie?
Evolution teaches the survival of the fittest or the strongest will overpower the weakest. Even religion believe the strongest and biggest will over power the weakest or smallest religion. Does this attitude promote hatred.
- 8 months agoFavourite answer
Regarding man, Genesis 1:26 reports that God said: “Let us make man in our image, according to our likeness.” So he was to have godlike qualities, not traits that were simply a development of those of a beast. Genesis 2:7 adds: “Jehovah God proceeded to form the man [not out of some preexisting life form but] out of dust from the ground and to blow into his nostrils the breath of life.” There is no hint of evolution here, but, rather, description of a new creation.
- 8 months ago
"survival of the fittest" doesn't always equal the strongest. For example, the evolution of shells on turtles is to protect them from attacks.
Evolution by natural selection is how the world works. Anyone who denies the established truth of evolution is an uneducated moron.
- 8 months ago
It is a lie it sure is.
- sk8terboy1963Lv 48 months ago
Even if evolution were a lie..... it still doesn't prove a god by default.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- Anonymous8 months ago
Nobody knows and remember that Darwin said his book was only a theory. Dirt does not suddenly appear from no where without a good reason. Looks like it is time to take a little trip soon and fix a few things...
- RichardLv 68 months ago
Oh gosh, evolution may be a lie, I better start believing in an invisible omnipotent being with no evidence for existence!
- PubliusLv 78 months ago
Atheistic evolution IS a lie, pard.
A young cull will out-breed an aged but superior specimen.
The trends of atheistic evolution cannot be to life or diversity. They are to weakness, disease, and death. Only one mutation in 100 is even weakly beneficial. Half are fatal.
When our chromosome count supposedly changed from 48 to 46, exactly how did RANDOM events produce the exact same germ cell changes in enough members of the same group at the same exact time to produce a breeding population of the new genus? Even 50% wouldn't have sufficed. This is good agricultural science. If it isn't random, it's not evolution. It's intelligent design. Atheists can't have it both ways.
No, my religion teaches us to minister in love to everybody. There doesn't need to be any competition.
- PaulLv 78 months ago
I don't see any hatred in one form of living creature changing over time.
- Bobby JimLv 78 months ago
Evolution promotes the idea of conquering others, whether nations, tribes, or ethnicity, or animal species. It is the natural order in a Godless world. Most religions do not promote the idea. If David defeated Goliath, then religions promote the idea that God is often for the oppressed, and seeks to release them from the bondage of their oppressors. God puts His power on display in such cases, and the geographically tiny nation of Israel is His modern-day example.
- nineteenthlyLv 78 months ago
The evidence for evolution is overwhelming. The lessons you draw from it are not that might is right by any means.
- CaesarLv 78 months ago
Evolution do not teach the survival of the fittest or the strongest will overpower the weakest that is another lie made by some type of people. Survival of the fittest" is a phrase that originated from Darwinian evolutionary theory as a way of describing the mechanism of natural selection. The biological concept of fitness is defined as a reproductive and survival success... try to ask the ants about how they survive an extinction event unlike the "strongest" dinosaurs did...