Anonymous
Anonymous asked in Politics & GovernmentPolitics · 8 months ago

If we call the shooting"terrorism", does that mean we wouldn't be any safer without the guns? ?

Because you're distracted, now?

6 Answers

Relevance
  • Dv8s
    Lv 7
    8 months ago

    The U.S.A. will never be without guns. It's our right to bear arms, and those who are frightened, or don't like it, can move elsewhere.

  • 8 months ago

    In this case, we should be very concerned because it was a terrorist attack.  It appears that this self-identified Saudi terrorist group, with over fifteen known terrorists who were holding secret meetings, watching Taliban terrorist training tapes and plotting to attack American. Somehow these Saudi terrorists were granted permission -- to get into the US military bases--with legally obtained weapons purchased in Florida.

    This is very similar to Bush/Cheney and 911.  Someone in the White House must owe the Saudi's really big favors. Trump is sending US troops to Saudi to guard the Saudi's King's oil fields right next to the Saudi terrorist training camps.  We really need to question Trump's motives and soviet -style of running the US government. 

  • Ryde0n
    Lv 5
    8 months ago

    Terrorism is defined by the motive , not the means or methods .

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    No one can be safe if guns are everywhere. Gun fight at the OK Corral should have taught us that. If having more guns make us safer, then the old West was the safest place on earth.

  • What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    The issue ain't guns, Timothy McVeigh killed much more pple and without firing a single shot 

  • Anonymous
    8 months ago

    Yes.  We're not going back to"shooter".  

Still have questions? Get answers by asking now.