Yahoo Answers is shutting down on 4 May 2021 (Eastern Time) and, as of 20 April 2021 (Eastern Time), the Yahoo Answers website will be in read-only mode. There will be no changes to other Yahoo properties or services, or your Yahoo account. You can find more information about the Yahoo Answers shutdown and how to download your data on this help page.
Jerry and Mick share money in the Ratio of 2:3, Mick gets £900. Work out how much Jerry gets.?
(Please tell me how to work it out, thanks)
8 Answers
- AshLv 72 months agoFavourite answer
Jerry and Mick share money in ratio 2:3
That means Jerry gets 2 parts while Mick gets 3 parts
Given that Mick gets £900
If 3 parts of Mick are equivalent to £900
then 1 part will be = (1 part / 3 parts) * £900 = £300.
So Jerry gets = 2 parts * ( £300 / 1 part) = £600
- lenpol7Lv 71 month ago
Add the ratios 2 + 3 = 5
Then divide £900 by '5' which = £180.
£180. is the value of one ratio.
Hence 2 ratios ; 2 x 180 = £360.
And 3 ratios ; 3 x 180 = £540
Hence
J:M::2:3::£360:£540
NB Verification; you have the sum correct if the ratio values sum to the original total. In this case £360 + £540 = £900 ; TRUE>!!!!!
- ?Lv 72 months ago
900 lb is 3/5 of the whole value of the money,
then the total sum of the money=900(5/3)=
1500 lb. Jerry gets 1500 lb-900 lb=600 lb.
- What do you think of the answers? You can sign in to give your opinion on the answer.
- KrishnamurthyLv 72 months ago
Jerry and Mick share money in the Ratio of 2 : 3.
Mick gets £900.
Jerry gets £600.
- la consoleLv 72 months ago
Jerry and Mick share money in the Ratio of 2:3 → j/m = 2/3
Mick gets £900 → m = 900
You start from the first equation:
j/m = 2/3
j = m * (2/3) → recall: m = 900
j = 900 * (2/3)
j = 600 → Mick gets £300 more than Jerry →Jerry gets £300 less than Jerry
- Anonymous2 months ago
Assuming Mick is the 3, Jerry gets £600. That is unless Mick is getting the whole amount and is supposed to figure out how much of it to give to Jerry, in which case he gives Jerry £540. It's hard to say because your question is unclear, the phrase "shares money in a ratio of" being nonsensical.